Sex and the Surrogate | Buzz Blog
DONATE
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you.

Sex and the Surrogate

by

comment
Actor couple Sarah Jessica Parker, 44, and Matthew Broderick, 47, are expecting twin girls, thanks to the help of an unidentified surrogate mother. The couple has a 6-year-old son and wanted to expand their family but apparently had no luck conceiving the traditional way.

Wonder if surrogate laws in New York are as rigorous as they are in Utah. Surrogacy here was, until fairly recently, illegal. But in 2005, the Legislature approved surrogacy for married couples willing to jump through some rather daunting hoops.

For starters, the couple must not be able to have their own children. They must pass a home study. Both parties must pass a psychiatric evaluation. The surrogate then must relinquish all legal rights to the child. Also, the surrogate must be financially stable (i.e., not on welfare), have been pregnant before and be able to get pregnant again. All parties must be Utah residents. And the couple must pick up the tab for the surrogate's medical costs ... all of which can creep upwards of $30 grand.

Highly entertaining, though, was debate over this issue at the Legislature back in 2005. In a Deseret News article (dated Feb. 17, 2005), then state Rep. (now Sen.) Margaret Dayton, R-Orem, said she "was worried that the new law would be used by 'career women' to start a family, and open the prospect of a market 'where we are going to save our best heifers, I mean women, for breeding.'"

Career women vs. heifers? Isn't it just like the Legislature not to be able to have a respectful and thoughtful debate about this challenging subject? Discussing sex, gender and reproductive issues at the Utah Legislature is the ultimate "tilt" for most of our elected officials. But let's face it, it's not easy casting religious beliefs as laws. Good Christians must fall on their swords to protect the sanctity of unborn life, no matter how strange and inappropriate that effort might be.

And so, Sarah and Matthew, on your next Sundance visit, go ahead, bring the babies. We love babies here. But maybe keep that "career" thing you've got goin', Sarah, on the DL. It unnerves our lawmakers.





Tags