The Rick Koerber File--All 20 Boxes | Buzz Blog
DONATE
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you.

The Rick Koerber File--All 20 Boxes

by

1 comment

rick1.jpg
Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has indicated to the media in recent weeks that when the Utah Division of Securities presented charges against Alpine Businessman Rick Koerber that he decided to pass in 2007 on pressing charges for the state, citing a lack of “evidence.”

The Division of Securities in turn, handed the evidence over to federal investigators who brought fraud charges against Koerber on May 26.

According now to a blog by Rep. Steve Urquhart, R-St. George, the amount of evidence that was insufficient for Shurtleff’s office to act on in charging Koerber was over 20 boxes.

Urquhart concedes he can’t speak to the content of the boxes of evidence but questions the AG’s for passing on the case. He also makes the case that the Gov’s office need waive certain elements of the Department of Commerce’s attorney client privileges with the AG’s so that the evidence can be explored to really figure out what is going on.

It’s an interesting point Urquhart, argues.

Essentially there is only the appearance of impropriety on Shurtleff’s part in this situation(and others). But if certain evidence could be declassified and made available for examination it could perhaps prove one way or the other if there was any undue influence affecting the Attorney General’s decision.

Frankly, I couldn’t have said it better myself.