Health Care reform: Those darn Blue-Dogs | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

Health Care reform: Those darn Blue-Dogs


As I usually do, I will make a point by appealing to someone smarter than me. During this health care reform debate, I invoke the wisdom of Paul Krugman.---

In a recent NY Times article, Krugman notes that Obama's proposed health care reform would prevent insurance companies from denying coverage based on history, preexisting conditions, etc. This keeps them from gaming the system by covering only healthy people. But the money is made up for by not allowing individuals to game the system, as all Americans would be required to buy insurance even if they are healthy. In other words, the cost is off-set.

Additionally, Krugman points out the confusing blue-dog opposition to employer mandates. The blue-dog democrats cite fiscal responsibility in their opposition to reform, but the Congressional Budget Office has already said that without employer mandates employees would be forced to seek federal aid for medical bills, creating a huge cost of subsidies, and far from fiscally responsible.

The blue dogs reasons for opposing health care just don't add up—just like the conservatives reasons. Though it surely stokes their ego to be both a democrat and conservative, and appear more 'sane' than liberal democrats, they are really doing a disservice to America in their opposition.