Back Before States' Rights Were Cool... | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

Back Before States' Rights Were Cool...

by

comment

The Patrick Henry Caucus’ers in Utah (the subject of a CW online exclusive) are quickly making a name for themselves as a voice for reining in the iron fist of Obama’s growing federal government.The Daily Herald recently reported that Rep. Carl Wimmer, R-Herriman, one of the founders of the PHC, is looking to craft a bill to allow Utah to exempt itself from Obama’s coming socialist healthcare reform.

But looking back, it should be noted that before the PHC was really up and running there were other groups proposing measures to basically tell the Fed’s to step off.---

Immigration comes to mind, for one.  And while plenty of legislators (PHC and non) are now invoking the imagery of founding fathers, stars and stripes, fifes and tri-cornered hats, and who have all been rallying like mad for a proper separation of state and federal powers—that never really stopped them from voting for 2008’s omnibus immigration bill S.B. 81. The one giving the state powers normally reserved for the feds in enforcing immigration laws, and one patterned after an Oklahoma law that is still being challenged for exactly this constitutional question. The argument there of course being that if the problem was not being taken care of by the feds, then it should be left to the states to do something about it. Hmmm, interesting. 

But, hey, if federal law says that immigration enforcement is their deal, why not also support a resolution seeking a federal exemption waiver, so that Utah could constitutionally enact its own guest worker program? Bring undocumented laborers out of the shadows and contributing to the system in a controlled fashion, where they couldn’t be exploited or undercut the existing labor force?

Good move for a states’ righter? Right?

Well, it turns out PHC founder Wimmer voted against that one, but voted for S.B. 81. Go figure.