Tricky Wiki | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

Tricky Wiki



The Eagle Forum has been bullying Lt. Gov. Gary Herbert over his choice of successor, state Sen. Greg Bell because, by their lights, Bell is so frickin' gay-friendly they can hardly stand it. (Paul Rolly wrote about it here and here.) ---

In Realityland, Bell is no flag-waving militant equality activist (not that there's anything wrong with that). But he was reasonable enough to give a fair shot to some legislation that might have made the lives of gay and lesbian Utahns a bit easier—and, for that, he's incurred the wrath of Gayle.

Bell seems a decent sort, level-headed and damned smart. Politically, he's a moderate—but I guess to a right-wing nutjob in the Eagle Forum, a smart, moderate Republican is something akin to a Communist. The rest of the world, however, would be hard-pressed to characterize him as a firebrand. Personally,I'm glad to see Bell moving up; we need more intelligent people in government.

Interestingly, however, a series of edits was made July 19 to Greg Bell's Wikipedia article that seem to downplay his involvement with any "controversial" legislation. For instance, this statement (a sentence which, in its typical wishy-washy Wikipediosity, could hardly be considered controversial) was removed entirely:

He has also sponsored legislation that would grant financially mutually interdependent couples (without reference to sexual relationship) some "mutual dependence benefits" and legislation seeking to reform the lobbying and ethics rules in State Government.

The edits were logged to a numeric IP address, not a regular Wikipedia editor. The IP number tracks to a block of addresses administered by XMission's Salt Lake City office.

Now, don't get me wrong. There's no skullduggery afoot—it's just Wikipedia, for heaven's sake. Anybody can (and does) make edits. (Actually, the edits seem to improve the article's overall tone somewhat.)

But I can't help but speculate on the timing and motivation behind the edits—could it be that somebody sensed the wacky Eagle Forum was bound to hold such things against Bell, and decided to keep it on the DL?