Taking Back Wikipedia for Shurtleff! | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

Taking Back Wikipedia for Shurtleff!

by

1 comment

Yesterday, on Sep. 16th,  an interesting update was made to Attorney General Mark Shurtleff’s Wikipedia page. Wedged between the tabs “Personal” and “Public Service” was an entry entitled “Scandals.” The entry’s description was brief, and before it was deleted last night, read:--- “There have been numerous allegations that Shurtleff has allowed political donations or personal relationships to affect regulatory or prosecutorial decisions.” The section then bookmarked 17 references to varying news articles exploring alleged favoritism and conflicts of interest on Shurtleff’s part, from various local media including several articles run by the City Weekly-- this one, this one and this one.

An interesting addition, but what’s really interesting is how after being online for roughly four hours the entry disappeared.

Of course anyone wanting to see the previous entry can check out the “history” tab and see the old version. The plot thickens, however, when observing this revision history which shows that the author of the short lived “Scandals” entry, is a user who goes by Arkadelphiacornell. According to the revision log, Arkadelphia not only made the addition, but he also promptly removed it after a few short hours.

It may just be that Arkadelphia is still tooling around with the page, but currently with the “Scandals” section dropped down the wiki-memory hole, the entry as of the time of this post now reads like Shurtleff’s Senate campaign website, where visitors are treated immediately to a page outlining Shurtleff’s key election issues. The rest of the entry provides scant information addressing his history as a public servant in Utah.

Ironically, however, all the references to the “scandals” articles are still listed at the bottom of the page.

A call to Shurtleff’s Senate campaign was not immediately returned to City Weekly.