My Banned Words and Phrases for 2011 | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

My Banned Words and Phrases for 2011



Everybody puts out lists of hated terminology this time of year, when there's not much else to write about except self-indulgent pet peeves. So, for what it's worth, here are some words and phrases I'd like to ban in 2011:---

"Teabagger" -- It was funny for awhile, especially when Fox News pretended to be shocked about the existence of John Waters movies, but come on. Now that the inmates are running the asylum, it's lost its charm.

"I know, right?" is meant as a friendly affirmative, but it contains a self-congratulatory note that seems needy and defensive. Basically, "Your last statement was so clever and succinct it threatens my own status in the group so, even though I agree with what you said, I'd like to point out that the same thought occurred to me before you mentioned it, placing us back on equal footing." Its complimentary value is canceled out in its eagerness to share in the conversational glory, rendering it meaningless.

"Really?" -- Its main virtue is as an updated replacement for "Don't even go there" and "Oh, no, you didn't!" -- but with a lot less head-bobbing and finger-wagging. Still, it assumes a withering superiority that needn't be backed up, and is not necessarily deserved. Sure, somebody can say something totally idiotic, and be put down with a well-placed "Really?" On the other hand, somebody can say something sensible, and be put down by an idiot who likes to say, "Really?" It leads to one-upsmanship and bad cocktail-party conversations where every other sentence is "Really?" -- and anybody who has sat through something like this knows why it deserves a swift death.

Brandon's Big Gay Blog

Comments (8)

Showing 1-8 of 8

Add a comment

Add a comment