An Inconvenient Beer Ban | Letters | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Letters

An Inconvenient Beer Ban

by

comment

I have always been under the impression that once people reach age 21, they are mature enough, both physically and mentally, to handle decisions regarding alcohol purchase and consumption. Apparently, there are some among the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control who feel otherwise.

While we may be legally old enough to drink alcohol, some do not feel that we are mentally advanced or responsible enough to buy it at a gas station. This so-called “beer to go” is purchased conveniently, after which the adult who purchases it makes the decision to drive away with it. Perhaps I have been erroneous in my thinking for the past several years, but given the society we live in today, I believe that most things that we purchase are subsequently put into our cars and driven away. If beer is not purchased “to go,” what are we supposed to do with it? Drink it on site and continue home afterward? Seems like a very bad idea to me.

I suppose my question is: How would the DABC prefer we transfer our purchases (whatever they may be) from the point of purchase to our homes, where we are legally able to consume them?

By banning these locations from selling beer, I believe that the DABC’s efforts will result in creating the exact situation it is trying to eliminate. People will no longer have the convenience of buying beer within walking distance of their homes and will be forced to drive farther for their purchase.

I understand that the majority of Utah’s governing body does not consume alcohol. It is a widely accepted expectation that a dry state is a morally sound state. This potential “beer-ban recommendation” is little more than an abuse of power and a direct insult to the adult population of Utah, whether they drink beer or not.

Stacie Best
Sandy