Angry (at) Queers | Rant Control | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Rant Control

Angry (at) Queers


The unity of Utah’s LGBT community, noted in June 2009 by The Nation magazine, showed some cracks in recent weeks as a one-year truce was announced between leaders of Utah’s LGBT community and Republican leaders in the Legislature [see “Hits and Misses,”, Feb 10]. The disagreement was over the wisdom of deferring legislative debate over gay rights for one year.

Online commenter FNaught suggests the divide separates those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender from those who prefer the label “queer.” You can’t trust a queer to support gay marriage, FNaught writes, because many of them believe the legal institution of marriage is corrupt and queers shouldn’t want it.

“You can’t agree on strategy with people who don’t agree on what the goals are,” FNaught writes. “Of course, far-left ‘queers’ make up less than 2 percent of the GLBT community. Maybe things aren’t really that fractured.”

First, there is no distinguishable “queer” community—2 percent or otherwise— that has political goals distinct from Utah’s LGBT community, so that scapegoat is bizarre. More importantly, cooperation does not require stifling debate. Shaming members of a movement for their views or methods will do more to stall—and shrink— that movement than the disagreements do themselves.