Decriminalizing Labels | Hits & Misses | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Hits & Misses

Decriminalizing Labels

The latest from the Legislature on polygamy. A lobbyist on the Hill makes an extremely foolish comparison. Plus, Utah holds parent rights dear, but still wants to jump in.



Decriminalizing Labels
It came down to labels. But let's be clear—it was anything but. The Utah Senate merrily and unanimously approved decriminalizing polygamy because, you know, they suffer so. That's because they have to hide from the law, and this "subculture," according to The Salt Lake Tribune, enables the predators among them. Polygamy is a complicated and emotional issue, which in Utah has unique religious implications. Polygamy's also prohibited in the Utah Constitution, though a federal judge in 2013 said some parts of that law were unconstitutional. The Senate apparently thinks this is a human rights issue and that polygamist communities are in pain. If the Washakie Renewable Energy case is any indication, it's the pain of a lifestyle that includes "ritzy homes, expensive cars and Turkish industries," the Trib writes. The real pain comes from underage marriages, a focus on procreation and disposable boys.


Foolish Comparisons
Back to the labels. Into the Democratic Caucus room walks Angela Kelly, the director of the Sound Choices Coalition. Right? Kelly comes with a camera crew, right? She asks the audience how they label themselves and starts giving out nametags and asking people how they label themselves. "We're a lot of things, because we're humans, right?" she says. No one is sure what her point is, though she keeps saying, "right?" for affirmation. Rep. Sandra Hollins, D-Salt Lake City, says she's a wife, mom, aunt, family member, legislator and community activist, after which Kelly writes "slave" and passes it to Hollins, the lone black legislator. There was righteous shock at the comparison. Only Fox 13 News was really able to decipher what was going on. But if this was about polygamy, it devolved into racism quickly and whatever message Kelly had was lost, as she would say, right?


Utah's Nanny State
Whoa, here comes the nanny state. Rep. Brad Daw, R-Orem, won his second round chance to ban teens from using tanning beds. Yes, it's a health issue. The Trib reports that Utah has the highest melanoma rates and if you tan before you're 35, you have a 75% increased risk. But wait. This is the state that holds parental rights dear. Here, we derisively call public schools "guv schools" and resist calls to vaccinate our children—because it's a parent's right. We're the third worst in the nation, according to Health Testing Centers and it's anyone's guess if parents would vaccinate against Coronavirus, if they could. Who decides if their teens can get contraceptives? By law, the parents. It's not parents vs. the law; it's about health. So get over it.