Editing Movies for Content | Rant Control | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you.

News » Rant Control

Editing Movies for Content


Editing out naughty words and sexiness from movies to suit conservative Mormon tastes seems a bit distasteful to Dr. Phil Gordon [see “Scrubbed to Death,” Nov. 3, City Weekly]. Online commenters mostly talked about who has the power to put in the edits, and under what circumstances.

“The entire ‘artistic vision’ argument falls apart pretty quickly once you factor in the TV and airplane versions of movies,” wrote Jesse Harris.

BlackMamba responded that it’s not the editing that’s immoral, but doing so without permission, artistic or legal. Jim Hayes likened that to theft.

New Yorker Fern wondered whether anti-Mormon bigotry is involved.

If “Asian Buddhists were trying to accomplish the same thing,” Fern wrote, “Hollywood and the rest of us would look at them more sympathetically.”

“[Gordon] makes a great point,” wrote Ben. “Editing to suit morality is here to stay. I propose that, in fact, it never left.”

Indeed, in reading Gordon’s story, Rant Control thought of the Thomas Jefferson Bible in which the esteemed third president cut out all references to miracles—no virgin birth, no water into wine, no raising Lazarus. Jefferson believed he was removing corruptions added after Jesus’s death. The editor became the artist with his own overlapping vision. Whether Jefferson or CleanFlicks, that has appeal.