Marriage Regulation | Rant Control | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Rant Control

Marriage Regulation

by

comment
A new libertarian-leaning group argues that the best answer to debates about same-sex marriage and other issues is to remove government entirely and make marriages private contractual agreements in which the newlyweds set the terms [“Government-Free Marriage,” Feb. 9].

Online commenter Jeff was not persuaded. “The government does not regulate marriage, they protect marriage. … Limited government is important, but part of what it is limited to is protecting marriage.”

Not a single commenter had Jeff’s back.

“How on earth is the government protecting your marriage?” shot back Vanessa. “By limiting how you can be married, when, by whom, and what the terms of the marriage are? That is regulation.”

“Protect marriage? You clearly mean regulate for taxation and welfare benefits as the state sees fit,” added John Galt.

Justice for all pointed to inconsistency of some small-government proponents.

“Republicans want less government, but more government control and interference in our personal lives, i.e., who I can and can’t marry, when or how to have or adopt children, when to or not abort. You can’t have it both ways, folks.”

They have it both ways, Justice, with power vested in them by the state of Utah.