Mining Irony | Letters | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Letters

Mining Irony

by

comment

Every time a new mine is slated to open [“Sticky Issues,” Oct. 18, City Weekly], there are environmental groups that oppose it, as is their right. The irony is that these groups, along with everyone else, enjoy the benefits of the mining industry—aluminum for iPhones, steel for eco-friendly cars and buildings, copper for electricity, wind turbines, etc.—but they don’t want to allow the mines that produce these products to open, at least not around them.

The U.S. Oil Sands mine is the same situation, but with oil. We want cheap gas, but don’t want to have it produced near us. The environmental groups claim that more research needs to be done to examine the potential impacts but don’t mention that the permitting process for a new mine in the United States takes approximately five years—longer than almost any other country in the world—so all of these impacts can be examined. This mine was also approved by an Obama-appointed EPA administration that is as strict as any to date, and falls directly in line with the president’s plan to reduce foreign oil independence and increase domestic oil production.

The same thing happens over and over with mines: People want to enjoy the benefits, but they don’t want to get their hands dirty—it’s fine for someone somewhere else to do that.

JON CAMPBELL
Murray