Real Artpolitik | Rant Control | Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City Weekly
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on PressBackers.com, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

News » Rant Control

Real Artpolitik

by

comment
A preview of the art-meets-politics event organized by environmental crusader Tim DeChristopher lured one crusty critic who was not impressed [see “Tim DeChristopher vs. the Puppets,” Jan. 31, CityWeekly.net].

Duke criticized the event, calling a puppet show that demonstrates the power struggles between citizens, corporations and governments as “gimmicky.”

“Nothing less than affordable, clean, efficient, high-energy, renewable fuel will wean the world off of coal and oil,” Duke wrote, demanding “real solutions.”

Realist suggested a mass movement must be built to demand those solutions.

“History shows that things only change when people rise up, and people only rise up when they are sufficiently educated about political realities and inspired to be part of a movement that changes those political realities,” Realist wrote.

“It’s not called ‘Saving the Earth in One Night at Kilby Court,’ ” wrote settle down guys. “It’s about celebrating activism through art.”

The whole debate devolved in Duke accusing the others of misconstruing his argument, and vice versa, which was as interesting as two straw men boxing.

To me, Duke’s criticism is baseless from the start. Who’s to say a kid might not see a puppet show about nasty politics and turn to a life of science to solve the problems underlying the politics? Like art itself, inspiration comes in unpredictable ways.

Add a comment