Lawmaker: Ban the Box! | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

Lawmaker: Ban the Box!

Legislator aims to eliminate felony conviction questions from employment applications


How do we keep felons from ending up back in prison after they have served their time and been released? One Utah lawmaker says much of the recidivism is due to former felons being unable to find employment, and she has a solution to fix it.

Rep. Sandra Hollins, D-Salt Lake City, is trying to get Utah to join the national “Ban the Box” movement, an effort to get employers to remove the check-boxes on employment applications asking applicants if they have ever been convicted of a felony.

“When a person is applying for a position, we should not be asking them upfront if they have a felony," Hollins says. "Once they’ve been through an interview, then it’s OK to ask that question and do a background check. But my goal is to get people who have a criminal background the opportunity to get into an interview and explain what happened, without being automatically kicked out for a mistake they made in the past.”

The “ban the box” movement has swept across the nation recently, with 19 states and over 100 cities and counties passing the laws—most within the past 3 years—requiring employers to make individualized assessments of job applicants, rather than blanket exclusions without any context of what the felony conviction is, how it happened, or when it occurred. Even in the United Kingdom, Prime Minister David Cameron announced this month he was following the United States’ lead and instituting the rules for public employees in the UK.

"Ex-offenders are often rejected for jobs outright because of their past,” Cameron said, according to British news reports. “I want us to build a country where the shame of prior convictions doesn't necessarily hold people back from working and providing for their families.”

Hollins wants to emphasize that nothing in her bill forbids employers from performing background checks on prospective employees, nor does it stop them from refusing to hire someone because of a past conviction.

“Too many past convicts are now homeless or living in poverty because they have no opportunities," Hollins, who is also a social worker, says. "And a lot of the time if a person is able to get into a job interview and explain what happened, the employer has no problem." 

Hollins doesn’t think there’s any risk to “ban the box” laws. “An employer can still do a background check, so if someone was convicted of abuse they’re still not going to able to get a job working with kids, or someone convicted of fraud isn’t going to be able to get a job at a bank. But these people have paid the price, and served their time.”

Hollins says past felons “deserve that chance to participate in our economic system,” or they’re going to turn to a life of crime to provide for their families.

The bill has not yet been assigned to a committee for a hearing.