The People vs. Shae Petersen | Buzz Blog
Support the Free Press | Facts matter. Truth matters. Journalism matters
Salt Lake City Weekly has been Utah's source of independent news and in-depth journalism since 1984. Donate today to ensure the legacy continues.

The People vs. Shae Petersen

Artist, South Salt Lake, spar over strip club mural.

by

1 comment
Petersen completing another monumental work. - COURTESY OF THE ARTIST
  • Courtesy of the artist
  • Petersen completing another monumental work.

Is a mural the same thing as a business sign? South Salt Lake says so. But artist Shae Petersen, who was hired to paint a mural on the side of a strip club, suspects the city is putting the kibosh on his project because it doesn’t want to draw attention to a sexually oriented business in its midst.


On Oct. 2, South Salt Lake City Planner Alex White sent a letter to the owner of Exotic Kitty gentlemen’s club explaining that under city code “the sign you seek to have painted on the exterior of Exotic Kitty is not permitted.”


Rendering of what the Exotic Kitty mural was intended to look like. - COURTESY OF THE ARTIST
  • Courtesy of the artist
  • Rendering of what the Exotic Kitty mural was intended to look like.

Signs for sexually oriented businesses in South Salt Lake are more restrictive than those on other businesses: “No descriptive art or designs depicting any activity related to or implying the nature of the business is allowed,” city code says. "Signs may contain alphanumeric copy only.”


Neither White nor the city administrative office immediately returned calls for comment.


Recently, Petersen launched a petition appealing the city, and he is challenging what he sees as a sign/mural conflation.


“There are no ordinances regarding murals. That is the shady thing they’re trying to pull is by saying, ‘Oh, it’s a sign,’” he says.


You can read the city's brief letter below.

south_salt_lake_exotic_kitty_letter.png