The People vs. Shae Petersen | Buzz Blog
We need your help.

Newspapers and media companies nationwide are closing or suffering mass layoffs since the coronavirus impacted all of us starting in March. City Weekly's entire existence is directly tied to people getting together in groups--in clubs, restaurants, and at concerts and events--which are the industries most affected by new coronavirus regulations.

Our industry is not healthy. Yet, City Weekly has continued publishing thanks to the generosity of readers like you. Utah needs independent journalism more than ever, and we're asking for your continued support of our editorial voice. We are fighting for you and all the people and businesses hardest hit by this pandemic.

You can help by making a one-time or recurring donation on, which directs you to our Galena Fund 501(c)(3) non-profit, a resource dedicated to help fund local journalism. It is never too late. It is never too little. Thank you. DONATE

The People vs. Shae Petersen

Artist, South Salt Lake, spar over strip club mural.


1 comment
Petersen completing another monumental work. - COURTESY OF THE ARTIST
  • Courtesy of the artist
  • Petersen completing another monumental work.

Is a mural the same thing as a business sign? South Salt Lake says so. But artist Shae Petersen, who was hired to paint a mural on the side of a strip club, suspects the city is putting the kibosh on his project because it doesn’t want to draw attention to a sexually oriented business in its midst.

On Oct. 2, South Salt Lake City Planner Alex White sent a letter to the owner of Exotic Kitty gentlemen’s club explaining that under city code “the sign you seek to have painted on the exterior of Exotic Kitty is not permitted.”

Rendering of what the Exotic Kitty mural was intended to look like. - COURTESY OF THE ARTIST
  • Courtesy of the artist
  • Rendering of what the Exotic Kitty mural was intended to look like.

Signs for sexually oriented businesses in South Salt Lake are more restrictive than those on other businesses: “No descriptive art or designs depicting any activity related to or implying the nature of the business is allowed,” city code says. "Signs may contain alphanumeric copy only.”

Neither White nor the city administrative office immediately returned calls for comment.

Recently, Petersen launched a petition appealing the city, and he is challenging what he sees as a sign/mural conflation.

“There are no ordinances regarding murals. That is the shady thing they’re trying to pull is by saying, ‘Oh, it’s a sign,’” he says.

You can read the city's brief letter below.



Showing 1-1 of 1


Add a comment